Breach of fundamental
Directives or Rights in the EU
My name was written
Plaintiff,
bELOW WERE NAMES OF THE CEO WHO i tried to gett help from
vs.
Defendant name(s),
Øystein Løseth
Jonas
Abrahamsson secretary Gunillia Henriksson
Said he only uses the address below.
Carl
Gustafs väg 1. ( company address )
205 09 Malmö
Lars G Josefssson.
Kurt Ove Håkan Buske
(Håkan
Buske
)
address removed for the internet
Lars Frithiof.
address removed for the internet
Thomas Lars-Erik
address removed for the internet
Protus Nilsson
address removed for the internet
Konsumenternas elrådgivningsbyrå
: Sturegatan 10
11436 Stockholm
Vattenfall AB
Sturegatan
10
SE-162 87 Stockholm
E.ON Sverige AB
Stone
Sjögatan 3 , 217 65 Malmö
Carl Gustafsväg 1
205 09 Malmö
or
E.ON Sverige AB
Carl Gustafsväg 1
205 09 Malmö
Case no.T
814-11. Breach of fundamental
Directives or Rights in the EU
The court statement “ according to the rättegångbalken
(Judicial Procedure )if you file your complaint at Norrtälje
tingsrätt and later some of the defendents object since they find
that the Norrtälje tingsrätt is not the right court, you could
be obliged to pay the defendants cost of Litigations no matter the
outsome of the case if they do not live in that area.” - is
forcing me to ask the court for a change of venue. Even though I
do not beleive that the parites I am suing gives their correct
registered address (folkbokförda).It is obvious that the court
knows and will transfer it to the correct one.
Many people have told me that the people who serve
subpena in Sweden have even went to their job to serve a
subpena. If you do not to serve these CEO people on their
job it put them above the law. It is not equal if you are
a poor (a working person) on job but they can come
to your job but if you are rich they cannot us that the
rich can hid?I propose that the law is changed or amended
I am writing this the best I can
until I can find. an attorney
I can only write
the working address of the defendants, and the
court should find out their
residential addresses.
i am doing
the best i
In Sweden, it is hard to get an
attorney that lives up to the requirements the American Embassy
wrote that an attorney should have in a foreign country. When I
finally found one.
He was only interested in the money as soon
as my insurance company paid him. He quit when asked questions by
me about my case. If he did his job, I would not be filing this. I
will like time to find an attorney since it is on my Blog on the
internet it might be easier.
I cannot get legal aid because you
must have a lawyer first. The statement echoed by many foreigners
as showed in statement below made by a Canadian/Swedish :. I am
white, Canadian and speak Swedish, "Racism exists in Sweden
and sorry to say so does corruption.
I hold a Swedish passport
but was born in Canada and my lawyer and I feel that 'that' my
case is being handled differently than a Swedish born
citizen.
because of this my lawyer has stated on more than one
occasion that he is amazed that
the courts are treating me so
differently.. you tell me this is not Racism." That was a
statement by a foreigner. I am brown not
black.
a. ''
I request that not E.on or
Vattenfall not sent out any collection Agencies while this case is
in the court and under discussion
as they had in the past.
b..
I request that the password on my account be working on that
belong to both E.on and Vattenfall.
It was very hard to check
information about me which I supposed to be able to see.
c..That
I do not receive for at least 5 years due to the trauma and way
this has to be treated
d..If I lose,I am on a pension and
would like to make a plan that I would not starve. furthermore
e.I request to make unharassed payment not stressed with
threats from them, collection agencies or anyone regarding the
allege bills.
If I am harassed the case is reopened and heard
in the EU courts. This request is made because in the past even
though it was against the law I was harassed and forced to make a
payment.
They broke against many fundamental rights of the EU
directives. I may have written in the wrong field
but some
Directives which they broke against belong in both fields.
This
can never be worked out by the defendants due to the abuses of
power by everyone on me.
The injustices should not have never
had been committed.
Paying the money would make them think
again before they do it to another person.Whether it be a
foreigner like me and even a Swedish person
This could have
been stopped and corrected if any of the defendants
involved
in the case took the time to investigate or appointed and checked
on the people involved. They could have made changes
and
making changes instead of threatening and punishing me.
They
have the responsible. They are paid a high salary and have done
nothing or very little to help me. I have attempted
to settle
this matter but the VD of the companies had not been able to help.
They have not control over
their company. I do not have any
hot water and without that. I cannot live. My radiators are not
working.
I had oil at one time and a heat pump at another
time.. My bills should never be that high or the
same if I am
not at home I have been sent threatening letters, There is proof
out there that meters can make
a mistake. I will send the
article by email if the case is accepted.
I need a (rättstolkar
) court specialized interrupter for my case. because of the
importance.
This includes all bills that are open that are not
(preskriberas )not under status of limitation has
passed.
. They broke against
the Fundamental Rights of the
EU directives. I have been embarrassed and humiliated,
and my
rights denied due to their power. My fundamental Rights according
to the EU has been denied.
I live under a constant threat that
when I come home or at any time my electricity will be turned
off.
.My food will spoil and not be able to live there due to
not have hot water.
They take the time to make a secret
agreement about their salary and take care of their employees
That is admirable but that does not help the customers like
me.
Chapter I
directive: dignity (human dignity, the
right to life, the right to the integrity of the person, The
Nailing of information on my private house ( villa ) should never
have been done.
It was to just to humiliate me and tell others
about my life. Nothing should have been done, since I was
appealing and the fact in disputes. I was chocked and humiliate to
find it on my door. Since my bills were in dispute, and I had an
attorney.
Nailing should not exist it is degrading for
everyone. I should have been allowed a court
trial, as
promised, many times. .The electricity's companies want to charge
money for writing to the social Department
cannot or will not
help me. They are spreading information to embarrass me. I have
the letter from the social department telling me they cannot help
me.
I do not have an impartial and adequate represent, which
should be allowed in this case since against
serous body harm.
Equality before the law is not used to when they nailed the notice
while telling they would not
do it. Furthermore, I was
communicating about the case. It was too embarrassing and
humiliating to me. Trying to take
or threatening to take my
electricity being declared as trying to take my civil and human
rights away.
It is against my civil, human rights, United
nations and EU laws. If something goes wrong
a person should
have the right to appeal and not be punished. As they have done to
me.
The Electricity Company forced me to deal with a supervisor
who was taken with me.
When I asked him to stop. A person sent
out by an electricity went a someone and through the door told
about me, and that they were going to cut off my electricity. That
should never be done.
Chapter two
directive: freedoms (the
right to liberty and security, respect for private and family
life, protection of personal data, the right to marry and found a
family, freedom of thought, and other items.
a. My right to
a private and family is not being allowed. The Europe court rules
for a life.
b.
There are known problem with the new type of
meter which everyone should know it. I can send the newspaper
article by email
c..All parties' disregards for the way I have
been treated in trying to get it solved. They want money for
services not given. I would
LIKE to know how much money all the
people involved are charged because they might NOT care because
they do not have to pay for it. It is important to case to know
how much they are paying like their discounts, etc.
d.
Charge for a letter when the social department cannot help but
contributes to me feeling worst.
e. The secret agreement to
pay the former vd Lars G Josefssson. Josefsson was exposed by
Westerberg and Gejrot and has now been found to be in breach of
government guidelines on remuneration.They can have one about me
or anyone else.
The parties can have a secret agreement like
that to treat me and others the way they have.
" An
Electricity Market. The lack of competition means that power
companies actually earn extra money in downtime and poor job data.
The bill goes to consumers and tenants. This has to stop writing
Reinhold Lennebo and Christer Jansson, property owners on the
Swedish side Focal Dagbladet debate today.
believe that the
strong concentration of ownership is by far the biggest problem
with the electricity market do not have support for the perception
of the state's expert authority in the area,
f. . They do
not live up to their mission statement. They put their employee
rights in front of the customers.
g. I cannot see the
information on their sites t because their passwords given do not
work or they will not let me on
h. Employees hang up on me
because I speak English sometimes.
g. Bills are sometimes sent
two in a month which caused me to pay just one.
10. They
wanted to cut my electricity off in the Swedish winter even though
in a dispute and harmful and gave me only about two days to get
the money.
VI: justice (the right to an effective remedy
and a fair trial, presumption of innocence and the right of
defense, principles of legality and proportionality of criminal
offenses and penalties, the right not to be tried or punished
twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal.
a.A . I am
not allowed any representation. The electricity companies threaten
to turn off my electricity
even though there is a dispute and
life threatening
b. Maria Eliasson who is a lawyers/advisor at
the (Konsumenternas
elrådgivningsbyrå)Consumerpelargonins)ConsumerElectricity Advice
Bureau
said if it
causes damages or in dispute that is not
supposed to turn off the electricity.
I am considered guilty
and not given the
chance to be proven innocent which any
western law country or by EU laws.
. c. Since is the so
serious case I want to appeal to the Eu court.
Vattenfall and
E.on 10 reactors in Sweden and have influence which would make it
impartial trial in Sweden.
They EU court should hear the
case.
The weakest and least able to fight back that why I was
treated this way.
I read this statement and hear over a '' Many
Swedes are racist, and less socialized to people they do not know
'' They do not know me.
.The evidence
a. Emails to the
various CEO and people involved in the case and their answers to
me.
b. How they are interested in money and not solving the
problems. An example is how Vallenfall and
re going to withdrawn their money from a German
environmental fund to punish the people. They care about money and
not solving the problem. Their treatment of customers did not
count
c. Newspaper articles that show the meters can be
wrong
d. Statements from people stating how as a foreigner,I
would not get a fair trial in Sweden.
e.. Show how their
mission/Policy statements work against me. and how they are not
living up to it.
f.Show in my letter how they sent me two bills
sometimes in the same month.
g. How E.on and vattenfall acts
as one company.
h. Have their employees testify to their policy
concerning billings
i . Copy of my list of complaints from the
years.
j. Ceo that referred people to supposed to help me did
not check back to see if it was solved
k. My complaint list at
least two times, which do not include just the bills
n.
Questions
1. Can my electricity be turned off from
the outside? Before they changed my meter, I was told they had to
come into my house to turn if
off.````````````````
2. Can you get MY
vattenfall bills from the beginning?
3. Why are Letters to
turn off electricity sent out unsigned
4.Why are Letters to
turn off electricity sent out unsigned
Suggestions
1.
Customer should have a contract to sign for E.ON and Vattenfall
like they do in other companies abroad.
2 I become a paid
consultant for foreigners who feel discriminated do not anyone who
listens at those companies, but tells them they are wrong.
3.
Letters not being sent to the social if they cannot help. it is
like they did in my case,
it just causes embarrassment and
humiliates and information to people who cannot or will help.
Check with the person
first.
4. They should have to go to
court before turning without electricity is a life threatening.
Especially if you like me have to boil water to wash and to
clean wounds,
etc.
The I signed it |
|
